DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015006128-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-24

000126095

Contested design: 015006128-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015006128-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Glock Gesellschaft m.b.H.via PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Gaston-Glock-Park 1, 9170 Ferlach, Austria

Holder · RCD owner

Changchun Qiaochu Chouxin Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 5016, 5F, R&D Technology Center, Jilin Advertising Creative (Cultural), Jingyue Development Zone, Changchun City 130000, China

Represented by

Jörg Brettschneider

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

figurative mark 'GLOCK'

EUTM No 6 639 678 · EUIPO trade mark database · disclosed 2009-01-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant relied on earlier EUTM No 6 639 678 for toy guns, arguing the stylised GLOCK sign used on the contested toy-gun design infringed its mark under Article 25(1)(e) CDR.
  • Holder was invited to comment but filed no observations.
  • The Division found the goods identical and the sign on the design visually highly similar, aurally identical, and conceptually identical or neutral compared with the earlier mark.
  • It concluded there was a likelihood of confusion, upheld the invalidity application, declared the design invalid, and did not examine the alternative Article 25(1)(b) grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000109362

vs LAMAS GROUP S.r.l.s.

2020-06-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)218
000010584

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)218
000010585

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)218
000010583

vs East Sheen Industrial Co., Ltd.

2019-11-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)218
000106679

vs GUANGDONG ZHENFENG SCIENCE AND EDUCATIONAL TOYS CO.,LTD

2019-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)218
000105479

vs LAMAS GROUP S.r.l.s.

2019-09-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)218
000104541

vs Guangming CHEN

2019-07-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)218
000010881

vs BRICK TOY SRL

2018-07-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)218