DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009150683-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-21

000126437

Contested design: 009150683-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009150683-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xiaoli Peng, Xingli Groupvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Zhehou Cunmin Juweihui, Wenjing Town, Jingdong, Yizuzizhi County, Puer City, Yunnan Province, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Yongshanfang Biotechnology Co., LTD

China (CN)

401-9, Linzhan Fortune Building, Shenfeng Road, Liuyue Community, Henggang Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

extension cable offered on Amazon.de

ASIN B 087 NG7 2NF · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-04-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an Amazon.de disclosure of a similar extension cable from 24 April 2020.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and treated the extra cables in the offer as irrelevant to the comparison.
  • It found the contested design produced the same overall impression as the prior design despite minor connector and color-shade differences, so the design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138