DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008461172-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-01-14

000126255

Contested design: 008461172-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is granted, Community design No 008461172-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008461172-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ruxian Huangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

504, No.20 Sanxiang, Hetai Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Chao Zhaivia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Am Juliusturm 53, 13599 Berlin, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

National design

wall light

201930219858.0 · WIPO Global Design Database · disclosed 2019-10-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested wall-light design lacked individual character because two earlier designs, including a Chinese design published in 2019, created the same overall impression.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the Chinese design through the WIPO Global Design Database on 2019-10-25 and found designer freedom for wall lights to be high.
  • It found the designs shared the same key features and overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b).
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was invalidated, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268