DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003534833-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-02-03

000123554

Contested design: 003534833-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 003534833-0001. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Eversia, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Pol. Ind. El Tapiado C/José Fernández López, s/n, 30500 Molina de Segura (Murcia), España

Represented by

Padima

Holder · RCD owner

Exclusivas Nimbus, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

C. Doctor Fleming, 23 Pol. Industrial El Bovalar, 46970 Alaquas, España

Represented by

Baylos

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureDocumento 5

Facebook post showing the 'bolsa Bio Task' trash-bag roll packaging

https://www.facebook.com/somostask/photos/1800237653579602 · Facebook / Somos Task · disclosed 2016-12-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character and argued that all visible features were solely dictated by technical function.
  • The holder argued the kraft-paper packaging had a different overall impression, a more attentive informed user, limited design freedom, and no exclusively technical features.
  • The Division accepted the Facebook disclosure of the earlier 'bolsa Bio Task' packaging dated 6 December 2016 and treated it as prior art under Article 7.
  • It found broad design freedom and held that the contested design created the same overall impression as the earlier packaging, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.0309.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098