DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015053171-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-02-25

000126395

Contested design: 015053171-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015053171-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Angrolup Srlvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Sat Dumbrava, Comuna Cornu Luncii, Str. Principala nr. 144, Suceava, Jud. Suceava, Romania

Holder · RCD owner

Wistron Industrial CO., LTDvia PDF extraction

SC

Victoria House 306, Victoria Mahe, Seychelles

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAppendix 2.2 and 2.3

screenshots of a prior rectangular container or package secured with black straps on a pallet-like base

https://www.youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2023-07-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing that the same packaging method had long been publicly used and that the design was also dictated by technical function.
  • The holder argued the contested freight container was new and individually distinctive, stressed structural differences from the prior design, and denied that the applicant's evidence proved identity or disclosure.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube screenshots as prior public disclosure by at least 11 July 2023 and found the informed user would focus more on the shared rectangular strapped container on a pallet-like base than on the cited differences.
  • The contested design did not create a different overall impression from the prior design, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid; the Article 5 and Article 8 grounds were not examined further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.0309.0609.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098