DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015031525-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-05-05

000125835

Contested design: 015031525-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015031525-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yikai Tangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Pingyou Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Represented by

H&A

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

'Kids Snorkel Swim Mask' by EXP VISION (ASIN B08XK4L71Q)

https://www.amazon.com/Snorkel-anti-fog-goggles-snorkeling-swimming/dp/B08XK4L71Q/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=utf8&th=1 · Amazon.com · disclosed 2021-02-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an Amazon listing of a nearly identical snorkel mask disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder disputed the reliability of the Amazon disclosure date and argued differences in the strap, fastener and face coverage created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon listing as a valid prior internet disclosure and found the holder's archive and search evidence did not cast serious doubt on its authenticity.
  • Given the relatively high designer freedom, the Division found the shared shape, materials and colour features prevailed over the strap differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218