DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015062040-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-05-20

000127895

Contested design: 015062040-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015062040-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vernissage S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Trenzano, Italy

Represented by

Alessio Canova

Holder · RCD owner

G&G Papervia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Constanta, Romania

Represented by

Bogdan Alecu

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 8

DUBAI Luxury shower gel packaging design

https://web.archive.org / https://euthalia.it · web.archive.org · disclosed 2023-11-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested shower-gel packaging lacked novelty because an identical DUBAI Luxury design had been disclosed before 30 May 2024.
  • It relied on a 29 November 2023 web archive capture, earlier marketing evidence, and a witness statement confirming sales from May 2022.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the archived website evidence sufficient to prove disclosure and considered any visual differences immaterial under Article 5(2).
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 5(1)(b), so the design was invalidated without examining the other grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098