DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015068899-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-05-21

000127115

Contested design: 015068899-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150688990001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Ruikale Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Holder · RCD owner

Qiu Chen

China (CN)

Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Yanyun Zhang

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Polycristalline Silicon Solar Panel 2W 5V Outdoor Solar Charger

ASIN B 09H 4BK CK9 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2023-06-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier solar charger disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • The applicant filed Amazon screenshots and a later full printout identifying ASIN B 09H 4BK CK9 and a first online availability date of 2 June 2023.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the disclosure evidence and similarity arguments were left undefended.
  • The Division accepted the supplemental evidence, found the earlier Amazon disclosure proven, and held the minor design differences insufficient to alter the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138