DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015013461-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-05-23

000127715

Contested design: 015013461-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 0150134610001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ediesi SLvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Elda (Alicante), Spain

Represented by

Alvaro Perez Garcia

Holder · RCD owner

Meirong Huang

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Adhesive tape products shown in URLs, screenshots and photos from Amazon and other online platforms.

Amazon and other online platforms

Registered RCDD1

adhesive tape

EU design No 0080393820001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2020-07-15

Registered RCDD2

adhesive tape

EU design No 0085186410001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2021-04-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on internet disclosures and earlier EU designs said to show the same dividing line and opacity.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the URLs, screenshots and photos did not prove prior disclosure, and the identified earlier registered designs created a different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

05.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123795

vs Meirong Huang

2024-08-13Art 25(1)(b)057
000131724

vs Shenzhen Shuangzhi E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22Art 25(1)(b)055
000131630

vs Shenghui Wei

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)055
000131631

vs Shenzhen Shuangzhi E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)055
000130181

vs Shenzhen Zongyuan Technology Co., Ltd

2025-11-24Art 25(1)(b)055
000121025

vs FOLPOL ROBERT BARCZYK, JACEK CYGAN

2024-03-05Art 25(1)(b)055
000121039

vs FOLPOL ROBERT BARCZYK, JACEK CYGAN

2024-03-01REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)055
000122054

vs Scott Nettelton

2023-11-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)055