DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008480248-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-05

000126416

Contested design: 008480248-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0084802480001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Chung Pak (Guang Dong) Battery Industrial Co Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Fo Shan City (Guangdong Province), China

Holder · RCD owner

Dongguan Lianguang Electronics Technology Co.,Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Dongguan, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

National design

rechargeable battery

CN 305336774 S · IP Office of China patent database · disclosed 2019-09-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7Article 70(1)Article 79(7)(f)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier battery designs including Chinese design patent CN 305336774 S published before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the contested design differed through its silver metallic colour and a round LED opening below the USB charging connection, which it said clearly distinguished the design.
  • The Division found the prior Chinese design was validly disclosed, the informed user was a battery-unit user, and the designer's freedom was at least average despite functional constraints.
  • It held the common cylindrical body, poles, concentric-circle base, and charging recess dominated the overall impression, so the LED opening and colour difference did not create individual character; the design was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138