DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015027288-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-07-21

000126167

Contested design: 015027288-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150272880001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mera Group Corporationvia PDF extraction

South Korea (KR)

Seoul, South Korea

Represented by

Thierry Van Ransbeeck

Holder · RCD owner

Zielinski Robert und Raja Haroon GbR

Germany (DE)

Frankfurt, Germany

Prior art cited (2)

National designAnnex A.1

Food Waste Bin

Korean design patent No 300983328 · South Korea · disclosed 2018-12-03

Web disclosureAnnex A⚠ rejected as evidence

Design shown in a YouTube video, invoked as pre-disclosure by the holder

YouTube

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on Korean design patent No 300983328 and related disclosure evidence.
  • The holder argued the bins differ in proportions, handles, tab, and basket details, and that designer freedom is constrained for waste bins with inner baskets.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the Korean design patent, rejected the later YouTube-based design as inadmissible, and found broad designer freedom for these waste bins.
  • The Division held the differences were minor and the compared designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the application succeeded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098