DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002819391-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-21

000127337

Contested design: 002819391-0003

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the registered EU design No. 002819391-0003 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 002819391-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

WIPO-Elektrotechnik GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Schwanstetten, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Engelbert Theben

Germany (DE)

Borken, Deutschland

Represented by

Kathrin Schulze Horn

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogD1

POWER ECK socket strip / socket column

Lightbook 2014/2015 · Lightbook 2014/2015 catalog

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested socket-strip design was non-unitary and lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier POWER ECK product disclosed before filing.
  • The holder challenged the evidentiary value and visibility of the cited images, stressed differences in front width, openings, materials and colours, and argued any view inconsistency could be cured by interpretation or deleting image 3.3.
  • The Division accepted D1 as publicly disclosed through the Lightbook 2014/2015 catalog distributed in the EU before the filing date and found broad designer freedom apart from standardized socket constraints.
  • It held that the shared elongated trapezoidal corner-strip form, asymmetric stacked sockets and axial cover dominated the overall impression, while differences in socket count, colour, proportions and rear details were minor.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character, and the holder was ordered to bear the applicant's costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138