DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015067280-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-28

000129601

Contested design: 015067280-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015067280-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kang Xuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaolin Peng

China (CN)

Meizhou, Guangdong Province, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

'Maths fidget spinner' calculation toy

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0D9 GFZ KHM · Amazon.de · disclosed 2024-07-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier designs, relying in particular on an Amazon listing for a 'Maths fidget spinner' disclosed on 15/07/2024.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) and found the relevant prior design publicly available before the filing date.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom and the near-identical overall appearance of the two toys, the contested design created no different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218