Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-04
000129263
Contested design: 015047032-0002
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150470320002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Iulian Adrian Calotavia PDF extraction
Romania (RO)
sat Pasărea, com. Brănești, Romania
Represented by
Crina Frisch
Holder · RCD owner
Veroniki Ecogrup SRLvia PDF extraction
Romania (RO)
Bucuresti, Romania
Represented by
Elena Grecu
Prior art cited (1)
trays for food packaging
No 022921 (design 2) · Romanian Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-02-16
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued that the contested food box design reproduced an earlier Romanian design and lacked novelty and individual character.
- ›The applicant relied chiefly on Romanian national design registration No 022921, published on 16 February 2022, as prior disclosure.
- ›The holder filed no observations, so the Invalidity Division assessed the individual-character ground on the applicant's evidence alone.
- ›The Division found the shared shape, bottom pattern, side ridges and top edges dominated the minor differences, so the designs created the same overall impression.
- ›The application was upheld for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR and the contested design was invalidated in full.
Deciding panel
- MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
- MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
- MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131325 vs HaoJun Zhu | 2026-05-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000131965 vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-05-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130985 vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd | 2026-03-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130944 vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd. | 2026-02-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130968 vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd. | 2026-02-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000129539 vs MOHAMAR JAMOU | 2026-01-14 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130088 vs Mindful eCom OÜ | 2025-12-15 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000129228 vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL | 2025-11-04 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |