DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015065893-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-04

000129824

Contested design: 015065893-0005

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered EU design No 015065893-0005 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015065893-0005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Silin Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Zunyi, Guizhou, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Suzhou Bimon Technology Co., LTD

China (CN)

Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

Represented by

A.Bre.Mar. S.R.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

wireless remote control

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 08M 3CP 17S · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-10-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested wireless remote control lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier identical remote control disclosed on Amazon on 28/10/2020.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon.de printout showing the product image, ASIN B 08M 3CP 17S, and availability from 28/10/2020.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the disclosure evidence and the applicant's comparison were unrebutted.
  • The Invalidity Division found valid internet disclosure, broad designer freedom, and no different overall impression apart from the word element on the prior design.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid in full, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148