DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015077673-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-12

000130165

Contested design: 015077673-0005

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and EU design No 0150776730005 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150776730005 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ping Wuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Holder · RCD owner

Zhongshan Bogesi Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Zhongshan City, China

Represented by

Jesús Eladio Sánchez Silva

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 2

SOARFLY LED transformer

ASIN B0C9WJW6SV · amazon.es · disclosed 2023-07-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested compact transformer design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier online-disclosed designs, relying in particular on an Amazon listing for a SOARFLY LED transformer first available on 18 July 2023.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, so the application was undefended.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon printout as proof of disclosure under Article 7(1) and found that the prior and contested designs shared the same essential housing, connector, colour, and embossed-symbol features.
  • Given the designer's average freedom and the close similarity of the designs, the contested design produced no different overall impression on the informed user and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138