DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000960844-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-10

000126935

Contested design: 000960844-0005

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 000960844-0005 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Heavy Power Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

Taiwan (TW)

Taipei City, Taiwan

Represented by

Taylor Wessing

Holder · RCD owner

WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

Germany (DE)

Minden, Deutschland

Prior art cited (17)

CatalogD1

electrical connector with three openings and red/orange front

Conrad Profession Elektronik und Technik 2006, p. 784 · Conrad Profession Elektronik und Technik catalog · disclosed 2006-12-31

Web disclosureD2

electrical connector terminal

tridonicatco-ct.com · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2007-10-14

Web disclosureD3

electrical connector terminal

tridonicatco-ct.com · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2007-10-14

Web disclosureD4

electrical connector terminal

tridonicatco-ct.com · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2007-10-14

Web disclosureD5

electrical connector terminal

tridonicatco-ct.com · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2007-10-14

Utility modelD6

Schraubenlose Dosenklemme

DE 203 03 537 U1 · DPMA · disclosed 2003-06-18

CatalogD7

In-Sure Push-In Wire Connector

IDEAL Power Vol. 12 2004 · IDEAL Power catalog · disclosed 2004-12-31

CatalogD8

electrical connector terminal

Ideal catalog · Ideal catalog

CatalogD9

electrical connector terminal

Ideal catalog · Ideal catalog

CatalogD10

electrical connector terminal

Ideal catalog · Ideal catalog

Web disclosureD11

electrical connector terminal

http://www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD12

electrical connector terminal

http://www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD13

electrical connector terminal

http://www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD14

electrical connector terminal

http://www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD15

electrical connector terminal

http://www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD16

electrical connector terminal

http://www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD17

electrical connector terminal

http://www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · Website archived by Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on numerous earlier connector designs and argued that many features were technically dictated.
  • The holder disputed the alleged disclosures and comparisons, maintained that the contested design had novelty and individual character, and argued the cited designs created different overall impressions.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted disclosure only for D1 to D17, rejected the claim that the contested design's features were proven exclusively technical, and found average designer freedom for connector terminals.
  • Comparing each earlier design individually, the Division found clear differences in form, proportions, openings, contrast, and overall impression, so the application was rejected and costs awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129364

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)137
000130781

vs Huiru Fang

2026-02-11Art 25(1)(b)137
000126936

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126938

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126923

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126940

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126926

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126939

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137