DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015058163-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-11

000130781

Contested design: 015058163-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015058163-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Puning Chiwei Electronic Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Puning City, China

Represented by

H&A

Holder · RCD owner

Huiru Fang

China (CN)

Huicheng Town, Huilai County, Guangdong Province, China

Prior art cited (9)

Web disclosureD1⚠ rejected as evidence

Temu offer for a "7 IN 1 EU Cube Power Strip" plug adapter

Temu

Web disclosureD2⚠ rejected as evidence

Shein offer for a power strip

Shein

Web disclosureD3⚠ rejected as evidence

Plug adapter shown in screenshot with product information

disclosed 2024-04-04

Web disclosureD4⚠ rejected as evidence

Plug adapter shown in screenshot

disclosed 2020-09-10

Web disclosureD5⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon.es offer for a Tessan plug adapter

Amazon.es · disclosed 2022-09-21

Web disclosureD6⚠ rejected as evidence

Amazon offer for a plug adapter

Amazon · disclosed 2023-11-22

Web disclosureD7⚠ rejected as evidence

Product screenshot from smart-electronics.es

smart-electronics.es · disclosed 2023-05-06

Web disclosureD8⚠ rejected as evidence

Product screenshot of a plug adapter

disclosed 2023-10-04

Web disclosureD9⚠ rejected as evidence

Product screenshot with product information

disclosed 2024-03-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on nine alleged prior plug-adapter disclosures from online marketplaces and web screenshots.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held that none of the internet evidence sufficiently proved disclosure because the materials lacked complete source and date information in a single reliable item.
  • Because disclosure under Article 7(1) EUDR was not established, the invalidity application under Article 25(1)(b) EUDR was rejected as unfounded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129364

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)137
000126936

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126940

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126938

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126926

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126935

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126923

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126939

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137