DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000960844-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-10

000126936

Contested design: 000960844-0007

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected; the applicant must bear the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 000960844-0007 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Heavy Power Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

Taiwan (TW)

Taipei City, Taiwan

Represented by

Taylor Wessing

Holder · RCD owner

WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

Germany (DE)

Minden, Deutschland

Prior art cited (17)

CatalogD1

electrical wire connector with three front openings and a red/orange front

Conrad Profession Elektronik und Technik 2006 catalog · disclosed 2006-12-31

Web disclosureD2

wire connector

tridonicatco-ct.com · tridonicatco-ct.com via Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2007-10-14

Web disclosureD3

wire connector

tridonicatco-ct.com · tridonicatco-ct.com via Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2007-10-14

Web disclosureD4

wire connector

tridonicatco-ct.com · tridonicatco-ct.com via Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2007-10-14

Web disclosureD5

wire connector

tridonicatco-ct.com · tridonicatco-ct.com via Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2007-10-14

Utility modelD6

screwless junction-box connector

DE 203 03 537 U1 (Figs. 15 and 17) · DPMA · disclosed 2003-06-18

CatalogD7

In-Sure Push-In Wire Connector

IDEAL Power Vol. 12 2004 catalog · disclosed 2004-12-31

CatalogD8

wire connector

Ideal catalog extracts

CatalogD9

wire connector

Ideal catalog extracts

CatalogD10

wire connector

Ideal catalog extracts

Web disclosureD11

wire connector

www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp via Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD12

wire connector

www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp via Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD13

wire connector

www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp via Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD14

wire connector

www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp via Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD15

wire connector

www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp via Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD16

wire connector

www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp via Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Web disclosureD17

wire connector

www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp · www5.mediagalaxy.co.jp via Internet Archive Wayback Machine

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on numerous earlier wire-connector designs and argued that several contested features were technically driven.
  • The holder disputed the relevance and proof of the cited disclosures, compared the designs in detail, and maintained that the contested design remained new and had individual character.
  • The Division accepted only part of the evidence as prior disclosures, found that exclusive technical functionality under Article 8(1) had not been invoked or proven, and assessed designer freedom as average.
  • Each accepted prior design created a sufficiently different overall impression and none was identical to the contested design, so the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded to the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129364

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)137
000130781

vs Huiru Fang

2026-02-11Art 25(1)(b)137
000126935

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126938

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126923

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126940

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126926

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137
000126939

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2026-02-10Art 25(1)(b)137