DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2019-02-04

R1636/2018-3

Contested design: 002951194-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal inadmissible

The appeal is declared inadmissible.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Declarar la inadmisibilidad del recurso.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Julio Garcia Abrilvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle Apóstoles 3, 30001 Murcia, España

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 57Article 35(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant (a freelance designer with no administrative support) filed a deferred-publication design application; failed to request publication and pay the required fee within the legal deadline (by 19 July 2018), resulting in rejection of the application.
  • Applicant filed a communication on 20 August 2018 styled as an 'explanation and request', not as a formal appeal, acknowledging the error and asking to re-register; the Registry notified the applicant that a proper appeal could still be filed before 22 October 2018.
  • The applicant did not file a proper statement of grounds of appeal; the Registry had already informed them of this deficiency and the deadline to correct it (2 January 2019).
  • The Board found the appeal did not comply with Article 57 CDR because no proper statement of grounds was filed; the appeal was therefore inadmissible.
  • Appeal declared inadmissible; the contested examiner's decision is final.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurH. Salmi
  • MemberE. Fink
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2384/2023-32024-01-24Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R1172/2022-32022-12-02Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R1171/2022-32022-11-30Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R2022/2021-32022-06-21Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R0365/2021-32021-06-22Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R0658/2020-32020-08-24Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R2945/2019-32020-08-14Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R0302/2019-32019-11-18Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3