DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015025230-0002

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-03-20

R2353/2023-3

Contested design: 015025230-0002

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The Board notes the withdrawal of views 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1, sets aside the contested decision, and remits the case to the examiner for continuation of the registration proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Kammer nimmt die Rücknahme der a) Ansicht 1.1 in der Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusteranmeldung Nr.15025230-0001, b) Ansicht 2.1 in der Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusteranmeldung Nr. 15025230-0002, c) Ansicht 3.1 in der Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusteranmeldung Nr. 15025230-0003, und d) Ansicht 4.1 in der Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusteranmeldung Nr. 15025230-0004 zur Kenntnis. 2. Die angefochtene Entscheidung wird aufgehoben. 3. Die Sache wird zur Fortsetzung des Eintragungsverfahrens an die Prüferin zurückverwiesen.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

IO HAWK INVEST GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Höffgeshofweg 7, 47807 Krefeld, Deutschland

Represented by

Michael Fülling

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 3(a)Article 47(1)(a)Article 11(3)Article 63(2)

Argument summary

  • The examiner objected that the views filed for each design were inconsistent and related to more than one design, so the applications would be refused unless corrected.
  • The applicant did not respond in first instance, then appealed and requested continuation only for the views the examiner had treated as “design B”.
  • The Board used its discretion under Article 63(2) to take account of the applicant’s clear appeal-stage withdrawal of views 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1.
  • The appeal was upheld; the refusal was set aside and the case remitted so registration could continue for the remaining views only.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarM. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0615/2023-32024-08-27Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0615/2023-32024-08-27Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0615/2023-32024-08-27Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0837/2020-32021-11-30Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0116/2025-32025-07-14Decision confirmedArt 63(2)4