DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015025230-0003

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-03-20

R2353/2023-3

Contested design: 015025230-0003

Appellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The Board takes note of the withdrawal of views 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1, sets aside the contested decision, and remits the case to the examiner for continuation of the registration procedure.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Kammer nimmt die Rücknahme der a) Ansicht 1.1 in der Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusteranmeldung Nr. 15025230-0001, b) Ansicht 2.1 in der Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusteranmeldung Nr. 15025230-0002, c) Ansicht 3.1 in der Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusteranmeldung Nr. 15025230-0003, und d) Ansicht 4.1 in der Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusteranmeldung Nr. 15025230-0004 zur Kenntnis. 2. Die angefochtene Entscheidung wird aufgehoben. 3. Die Sache wird zur Fortsetzung des Eintragungsverfahrens an die Prüferin zurückverwiesen.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

IO HAWK INVEST GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Höffgeshofweg 7, 47807 Krefeld, Deutschland

Represented by

Michael Fülling

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 3(a)Article 47(1)(a)Article 63(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant appealed the examiner’s refusal of four Community design applications for inconsistent views and requested continuation based only on the views labelled by the examiner as design B.
  • The applicant simultaneously filed for restitutio, but the appeal itself relied on an express withdrawal of views 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1.
  • The Board exercised its discretion under Article 63(2) CDR to admit the applicant’s late but clear withdrawal of the defective views.
  • The refusal was set aside and the case was remitted so registration could continue for views 1.2-1.7, 2.2-2.7, 3.2-3.7 and 4.2-4.7 only.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarM. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0615/2023-32024-08-27Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0615/2023-32024-08-27Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0615/2023-32024-08-27Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0837/2020-32021-11-30Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0116/2025-32025-07-14Decision confirmedArt 63(2)4