DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009192768-0003

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-08-27

R0615/2023-3

Contested design: 009192768-0003

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The Board took note of the amended views, annulled the contested decision, and remitted the case to the examiner for continued registration proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Takes note of the amended views No 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 for Community design No 9 192 768-0002, and the amended views No 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 for Community design No 9 192 768-0003. 2. Annuls the contested decision. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution of the registration procedure.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Digital distillery LLCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

1419 Murray Drive, 64116 North Kansas City, United States

Represented by

HGF B.V.

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 4(1)(c)Article 46(3)Article 60(1)Article 63(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant appealed the refusal of designs 0002 and 0003 and sought acceptance of its priority claim and replacement views.
  • It argued that an Office-side IT incident prevented successive representatives from accessing the file and learning of the deficiency notice before the deadline expired.
  • The Board found the deficiency notice had been duly sent, but the evidence showed substantial efforts to access the file and a technical incident that delayed any response.
  • Exercising its discretion, the Board accepted the amended views and found the priority documents sufficient, then annulled the refusal and remitted the case.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurH. Salmi
  • MemberC. Negro
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0615/2023-32024-08-27Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0615/2023-32024-08-27Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R2353/2023-32024-03-20Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0837/2020-32021-11-30Decision annulledArt 63(2)5
R0116/2025-32025-07-14Decision confirmedArt 63(2)4