DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0026

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0026

Appellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The contested decision is annulled, the design application proceeds to registration with a filing date of 9 June 2023, and the case is remitted to the examiner for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 38(1)Article 4(1)(e)Article 10(2)Article 4(1)(c)Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the original 9 June 2023 filing date should stand because the initial digital images were suitable for reproduction and Article 10 CDIR could not impose an 'excellent quality' standard.
  • No opposing private party was involved; this was an ex parte appeal from the examiner's refusal to accord the original filing date after accepting replacement views filed on 14 July 2023.
  • The Board found the initial images technically reproducible and sufficiently clear to identify the designs, and held that the examiner had not substantiated any concrete technical deficiency.
  • Appeal upheld: the application keeps the 9 June 2023 filing date, the case returns to the examiner, and design 0013 may proceed on its amended representation without losing that date.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarM. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9