DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0028

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0028

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The Board annuls the contested decision, allows the Community design application to proceed to registration with a filing date of 9 June 2023, and remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 4(1)(e)Article 10(1)(c)Article 10(2)Article 38(1)Article 46(3)Article 4(1)(c)

Argument summary

  • The applicant appealed the refusal to accord the original filing date, arguing the initial images were suitable for reproduction and clearly showed the designs despite not being perfect.
  • It argued the examiner wrongly imposed an 'excellent quality' standard with no basis in the design regulations and that any request for better images should not have shifted the filing date.
  • The Board found the original computer-generated images satisfied Article 36(1)(c) CDR and Article 4(1)(e) CDIR because the protected subject matter and details were clearly identifiable.
  • The Board held the later image-quality objection was unjustified, restored 9 June 2023 as the filing date, and remitted the case for further prosecution.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9