DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0035

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0035

Appellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The appeal is upheld, the contested decision is annulled, the application keeps the filing date of 9 June 2023, and the case is remitted for further prosecution.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 4(1)(e)Article 38(1)Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant appealed the refusal to accord the original filing date of 9 June 2023 to its multiple Community design application.
  • It argued the initial images were suitable for reproduction, clearly showed the designs, and any request for better-quality images concerned only non-substantive presentation issues.
  • The Board found the original computer-generated images met Article 36(1)(c) CDR and Article 4(1)(e) CDIR because the designs were identifiable and their details clearly distinguishable.
  • The Board annulled the decision, accepted 9 June 2023 as the filing date for the application, and remitted the case to the examiner.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9