DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015024173-0045

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-07-09

R2254/2023-3

Contested design: 015024173-0045

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal upheld (reversal)

The appeal is upheld, the contested decision is annulled, the design application is allowed to proceed to registration with a filing date of 9 June 2023, and the case is remitted to the examiner.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Annuls the contested decision. 2. Allows Community Design application No 15 024 173 to proceed to registration with the filing date of 9 June 2023. 3. Remits the case to the examiner for further prosecution.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATIONvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

650 Madison Avenue, 10022 New York, United States

Holder · RCD owner

No opposing holder — Other appeal · Board of Appeal.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 36(1)(c)Article 4(1)(e)Article 38(1)Article 4(1)(c)Article 46(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the original images were suitable for reproduction and clear enough to secure the original filing date of 9 June 2023.
  • There was no opposing private party; the appeal challenged the examiner's refusal to accept the original filing date and the reliance on an 'excellent quality' standard.
  • The Board found the originally filed computer-generated images technically suitable and sufficiently clear to identify the designs and distinguish their details.
  • The Board held that the request for higher quality images was unjustified for most designs and that the separate deficiency for design 0013 was remediable without changing the filing date.
  • The appeal was allowed, the contested decision annulled, and the application was to proceed with filing date 9 June 2023.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Pohlmann
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9
R2254/2023-32024-07-09Decision annulledArt 4(1)(e), Art 38(1), Art 36(1)9