DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003030881-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-03-29

000010598

Contested design: 003030881-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid; and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0030308810001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hajdù Gabona Zrt

Hungary (HU)

Széchenyi u. 13, 4025 Debrecen, Hungary

Holder · RCD owner

DN Trade Group Ltd.

Bulgaria (BG)

109-A "Tsar Osvoboditel" Road, Office 41, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria

Represented by

Intelect SRL

Prior art cited (3)

Prior use

Horse-herder graphic used on the applicant's flour packaging in 1 kg, 2 kg and 5 kg paper bags.

Hungary and Romania

Trade markD3

Hungarian trade mark used as the prior design for comparison.

Hungarian Trademark Registration No 176859 · Hungarian trade mark register · disclosed 2002-07-29

Trade markD4

Hungarian trade mark invoked as a prior right for likelihood of confusion.

Hungarian Trademark Registration No 218863 · Hungarian trade mark register · disclosed 2016-03-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier horse-herder packaging and trademarks, and also invoked protected-emblem, confusion, and copyright grounds.
  • The holder argued the design had distinct visual features, denied any improper use of the Hungarian flag, challenged some evidence quality, and disputed the trademark and copyright claims.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of Hungarian trade mark D3, found the contested design not identical to it, but held that the shared horse-herder motif and tricolour ribbon created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6, the RCD was declared invalid, and the remaining grounds were left unexamined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidated326
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidated326
000129181

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2025-10-16REUD invalidated326
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidated326
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidated326
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidated326
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidated326
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidated326