DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002753368-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-05

000010278

Contested design: 002753368-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002753368-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Formaster S.A.

Poland (PL)

ul. Fabrycna 24, 25-818 Kielce, Poland

Represented by

Patpol Sp. z.o.o.

Holder · RCD owner

Seventh Generation Ventures, Inc.

United States (US)

60 Lake St., Burlington 05401, United States of America

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

'dafi' water filtering bottle shown at the applicant's Aquatech China 2014 booth

Aquatech China 2014 trade fair, Shanghai · disclosed 2014-06-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 7Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, and also invoked an earlier copyright-based entitlement to the bottle design.
  • The holder disputed prior disclosure, argued the bottle was new and had individual character, relied on US design patent prior art, and requested rejection plus oral proceedings.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted disclosure of the applicant's 'dafi' bottle at Aquatech China 2014, rejected the novelty ground, but found the shared bottle shape created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127975

vs Kraftling GmbH

2025-06-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)0910
000010930

vs SC VIKING INTERNATIONAL SRL

2018-08-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)0910
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098