DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003613512-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-09

000010790

Contested design: 003613512-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003613512-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jianhui Li

China (CN)

161st, Pinghu Street, Pinghu Town, Longgang District, Shenzhen, the People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Becker Kurig Straus

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Abizoe E-commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 509, No. 16, Longsheng Road, Longgang Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, the People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

tablet case cover

RCD No 002091934-0001 · EUIPO database · disclosed 2012-08-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested tablet-case design lacked novelty and individual character over his earlier RCD No 002091934-0001.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity application undefended on the merits.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was properly disclosed, rejected the novelty claim because the differences were not wholly immaterial, but held the similarities dominated the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038