DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002618413-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-19

000010631

Contested design: 002618413-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Se deniega la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 0026184130001. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas de la titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Consell Insular d’Eivissa

Spain (ES)

Avda. España, 49, 07800 Ibiza, España

Holder · RCD owner

Serra Vila Gemmavia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

c/ Romani, 8, 08192 Sant Quirze del Valles, España

Prior art cited (4)

Web disclosureD1

Cursos que preservan la tradición article showing espardenya design

http://www.diariodeibiza.es · Diario de Ibiza · disclosed 2014-06-23

Web disclosureD2

El hombre de la alpargata article showing espardenya design

http://www.alvarodelarica.com · Álvaro de la Rica weblog · disclosed 2014-04-24

Web disclosureD3

Nueva promoción de artesanos de artículos tradicionales article showing espardenya design

http://www.diariodeibiza.es · Diario de Ibiza · disclosed 2008-06-22

Web disclosureD4

Espardeñas – Insotel – Ibiza article showing espardenya design

http://franciscogarvi.com · Francisco Garvi weblog · disclosed 2014-10-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the espadrille design merely copied traditional Ibizan footwear already shown in press articles, blogs, and cultural materials predating the filing date.
  • Holder replied that the woven upper, tying system, band width, and number of bands gave the contested espadrille a singular and novel external configuration.
  • The Division accepted the internet disclosure of D1 to D4 but found the compared uppers differed in weave pattern, band count, and structure enough to avoid identity and to produce a different overall impression.
  • The contested RCD was found novel and to have individual character, so the application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106199

vs CALZATURIFICIO MERLYN SHOES SRLS

2020-02-18Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000105199

vs Angels GmbH

2019-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011237

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028