DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002593228-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-26

000010259

Contested design: 002593228-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0025932280002 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate in 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Buena Vista Modevertriebs GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Fraunhofer Straße 6, 97076 Würzburg, Germania

Holder · RCD owner

Imperial S.p.a.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via dei Lanaioli 42, 40050 Funo di Argelato (BO), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Unregistered jeans/trousers design shown on the holder's Facebook page

Facebook page of the holder · disclosed 2013-04-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested trousers design lacked novelty over prior design D1 disclosed online before 9 December 2014.
  • The holder challenged admissibility and disclosure, and argued the cited jeans images did not fully or identically anticipate the contested design.
  • The Division accepted the Facebook screenshot, enlarged images, and affidavit as sufficient proof that D1 had been disclosed to the public before the filing date.
  • On the merits, the Division found visible differences in wrinkles, seam configuration, belt loops, pocket shape, and stitching, so D1 was not identical to the contested design.
  • The invalidity application was therefore rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106199

vs CALZATURIFICIO MERLYN SHOES SRLS

2020-02-18Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000105199

vs Angels GmbH

2019-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011237

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028