DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002593228-0036

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-26

000010260

Contested design: 002593228-0036

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of RCD No 0025932280036 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0025932280036 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate in 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Buena Vista Modevertriebs GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Fraunhofer Straße 6, 97076 Würzburg, Germania

Holder · RCD owner

Imperial S.p.a.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via dei Lanaioli 42, 40050 Funo di Argelato (BO), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Unregistered CDD1

rear pocket design for jeans

Facebook · disclosed 2013-12-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on D1, a jeans pocket design shown in a Facebook screenshot dated 3 December 2013 and enlarged images.
  • The holder argued the application was unsigned and inadmissible, and that the Facebook screenshot could not reliably prove prior disclosure.
  • The Division found the invalidity application duly signed and accepted the dated Facebook screenshot, corroborated by an affidavit, as sufficient proof that D1 had been disclosed before 9 December 2014.
  • Although D1 and the contested design shared several pocket features, their differences were not irrelevant, so D1 was not identical and the novelty attack failed; the application was rejected with costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106199

vs CALZATURIFICIO MERLYN SHOES SRLS

2020-02-18Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000105199

vs Angels GmbH

2019-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011237

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028