DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002593228-0028

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-26

000010261

Contested design: 002593228-0028

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against Registered Community design No 0025932280028 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0025932280028 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate in 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Buena Vista Modevertriebs GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Fraunhofer Straße 6, 97076 Würzburg, Germania

Holder · RCD owner

Imperial S.p.a.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via dei Lanaioli 42, 40050 Funo di Argelato (BO), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Unregistered CDD1

rear pocket design for jeans

Facebook · disclosed 2013-12-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on prior design D1 allegedly disclosed on the holder's Facebook page before the filing date and grace period.
  • The holder argued the invalidity request was inadmissible for lack of signature and that the Facebook screenshot did not reliably prove online disclosure.
  • The Division held the application was duly signed and accepted the dated Facebook screenshot, supported by an affidavit, as sufficient proof that D1 had been disclosed.
  • The Division found D1 and the contested design shared several features but differed in visible stitching details, so they were not identical and novelty was not destroyed.
  • The invalidity application was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to reimburse the holder's representation costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106199

vs CALZATURIFICIO MERLYN SHOES SRLS

2020-02-18Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000105199

vs Angels GmbH

2019-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011237

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028