DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002593228-0014

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-26

000010262

Contested design: 002593228-0014

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0025932280014 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate in 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Buena Vista Modevertriebs GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Fraunhofer Straße 6, 97076 Würzburg, Germania

Holder · RCD owner

Imperial S.p.a.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via dei Lanaioli 42, 40050 Funo di Argelato (BO), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Unregistered CDD1

rear pocket of jeans

Facebook page of the holder; www.stile.it · disclosed 2013-04-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on earlier 2013 disclosures of a jeans back-pocket design shown in Facebook screenshots, a stile.it article, court materials, and an affidavit.
  • Holder argued the invalidity application was inadmissible for lack of proper signature, the online materials did not reliably prove disclosure, and the compared pocket designs were not identical.
  • The Division found the application duly signed and accepted the Facebook screenshots, article, and affidavit as sufficient evidence that D1 had been publicly disclosed before 9 December 2014.
  • The Division held that differences in the pocket cut and stitching were not irrelevant details, so D1 was not identical to the contested design; the invalidity application was rejected and costs awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106199

vs CALZATURIFICIO MERLYN SHOES SRLS

2020-02-18Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000105199

vs Angels GmbH

2019-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011237

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028