DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002593228-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-30

000010258

Contested design: 002593228-0004

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0025932280004 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0025932280004 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate in 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Buena Vista Modevertriebs GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Fraunhofer Straße 6, 97076 Würzburg, Germania

Holder · RCD owner

Imperial S.p.a.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via dei Lanaioli 42, 40050 Funo di Argelato (BO), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Unregistered CDD1

Earlier unregistered jeans back-pocket design

Facebook page of Imperial S.p.a.; www.stile.it · disclosed 2013-04-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that earlier online images and an article disclosed an identical jeans back-pocket design before 9 December 2014.
  • The holder argued the invalidity application was inadmissible, challenged the reliability of the Facebook evidence, and maintained the compared pocket designs were not identical.
  • The Division found the disclosure evidence sufficient under Article 7(1), but held the prior design and the contested RCD differed in several visible features beyond irrelevant details.
  • Because identity was not established, the novelty attack under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5 failed and the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106199

vs CALZATURIFICIO MERLYN SHOES SRLS

2020-02-18Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000105199

vs Angels GmbH

2019-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011237

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028