DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001972522-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-05-29

000010657

Contested design: 001972522-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of Registered Community design No 001972522-0001 is rejected, and the applicant is ordered to bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se deniega la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 001972522-0001. 2. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas del titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Alberto Forte Composite S.L.

Spain (ES)

Paraje Partida de la Marjal n° 61, 03450 Banyeres (Alicante), España

Represented by

PADIMA

Holder · RCD owner

ALJUAN S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

C/ Sevilla, s/n. - Pol. Ind. L'Alfaç, 03440 Ibi (Alicante), España

Represented by

Javier Ungría López

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 8(1), arguing the packaging design's essential features were dictated exclusively by technical function for storing and preserving a cheese wedge.
  • The holder replied that the container could be used for various foods, that the applicant's technical reports assessed a product rather than the design, and that the design also included aesthetic choices.
  • The Division found the curved contours, peripheral strip, volume relationship between lid and body, and central recess showed aesthetic considerations, and the applicant's evidence did not prove all essential features were solely functional.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000115888

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-09Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000115908

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000104119

vs Dzhihangir Ibryam

2019-10-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000103859

vs PHOENIX IND SA

2019-07-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011140

vs GAMMA-A, SIA

2019-02-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011251

vs Guy Vanhoutte

2019-01-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011250

vs Guy Vanhoutte

2019-01-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000102462

vs TURCU GEANI-CRISTIAN

2018-12-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098