DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002763573-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-10

000010940

Contested design: 002763573-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002763573-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fibar Group S.A.

Poland (PL)

ul. Lotnicza 1, 60-421 Poznań, Poland

Represented by

EUPATENT.PL

Adam Pawłowski

Holder · RCD owner

Gang Wang

China (CN)

The two phase of A 2 unit 10 room 02, Jia Zhaoye Center, Huizhou Road No. 11, District of Huicheng, Huizhou City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

movement sensor/detector

RCD No 002380972-0001 · EUIPO Office bulletin · disclosed 2014-02-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCD No 002380972-0001, arguing both designs shared the same eyeball-like sensor and surrounding arm structure.
  • The applicant argued designer freedom for movement sensors was broad, so differences in the number of arms and colours were minor; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD through its published registration and found no relevant technical or statutory constraints limiting designer freedom.
  • It held the common overall structure and proportions outweighed the differences, so the contested design created the same overall impression and lacked individual character; invalidity was granted.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108