DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003043207-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-28

000010838

Contested design: 003043207-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0030432070001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sturm Handels GmbH

Germany (DE)

Graf-Bentzel-str. 85, 72108 Rottenburg, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Grzegorz Mieszczak trading as HELIKON-TEXvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Radomska 34, 54-032 Wroclaw, Poland

Represented by

Halina Jósefa Winohradnik

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogD1

Direct Action Dust rucksack

Product Catalogue 2014 · owner catalogue 2014 / airsoft-milsim-news.com · disclosed 2014-03-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7Article 8

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on the holder’s earlier 2014 catalogue disclosure of the Direct Action/Dragon Egg backpack.
  • The holder denied valid disclosure, argued the catalogue showed only a prototype, and maintained the contested design differed aesthetically and ergonomically from the earlier product.
  • The Division found the catalogue and corroborating online evidence sufficient to prove disclosure in March 2014 under Article 7.
  • It rejected the novelty ground because several visible differences were not immaterial, but held those differences did not change the overall impression given substantial design freedom.
  • The RCD was therefore invalidated for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038