DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001449714-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-10-29

000011112

Contested design: 001449714-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 001449714-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Intercon Tierbedarf GmbH

Germany (DE)

Brahmkoppel 4, 24558 Henstedt-Ulzburg, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

PrimoPet GmbH

Germany (DE)

Georgenhäuser Straße 1, 64409 Messel, Deutschland

Represented by

Jens Rößner

Prior art cited (1)

National design

Kratzbäume für Katzen

Geschmacksmuster Nr. 402009004358-0011 · Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt database · disclosed 2009-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty or at least individual character based on earlier German design No. 402009004358-0011 for cat scratching trees.
  • The applicant argued the earlier design had been published on 31 December 2009, more than six years before the contested design filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the DPMA database extract as sufficient disclosure evidence and found the earlier and contested designs created an almost identical overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberMartin LENZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308