Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-11
000124035
Contested design: 015007030-0008
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No 015007030-0008 is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text(es)
Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 015007030-0008. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Flexi-Bogdahn Technik GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
Carl-Benz-Weg 13, 22941 Bargteheide, Alemania
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Ediesi SLvia PDF extraction
Spain (ES)
Paseo Ronda, 88 bajo, 03660 Novelda, España
Prior art cited (1)
animal leashes
RCD No 01987181-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-06-03
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, and also alleged bad faith, relying primarily on earlier RCD D1 for animal leashes.
- ›The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character, denied bad faith, and said differences in prior designs and public-domain leash technology mattered.
- ›The Invalidity Division held bad faith and unfair competition were outside this invalidity ground, accepted D1 as disclosed, and assessed individual character under Article 6.
- ›It found the leash housing, handle shape, control button, outlet, central circle, proportions, and texture created the same overall impression, while the logo, colors, buckle, and bag dispenser were minor differences.
- ›The application was upheld in full on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b), so the contested design was invalidated and the holder was ordered to bear costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
- MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
- MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esSpanish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000129301 vs Yu Bao | 2026-01-23 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000129536 vs WENJIU YANG | 2025-10-28 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000129724 vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd. | 2025-10-20 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000124016 vs EDIESI | 2024-09-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000124036 vs EDIESI | 2024-09-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000123279 vs Jure MARKIČ | 2024-05-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000123434 vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd. | 2024-04-30 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |
| 000123141 vs Haoyu Wang | 2024-03-12 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 30 | 8 |