DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015002025-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-12

000123141

Contested design: 015002025-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 015002025-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzen Aiwo Pet Supplies Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 301, Building 15, Longwangmiao Industrial Building, Baishixia village, FuYong St, BaoAn Dist, Shenzhen City, Guangdong, China

Represented by

André Guerreiro Rodrigues

Holder · RCD owner

Haoyu Wang

Germany (DE)

Antonie-Boetzelen-Ring 141, 41179 Mönchengladbach, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

National design

pet brush

2022 3 0062344 / CN 307341908 S · Chinese Intellectual Property Office database · disclosed 2022-05-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested pet brush design lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier Chinese design disclosure.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Chinese design as disclosed before the filing date and found the compared brushes produced the same overall impression despite minor differences in decoration, bristles, and colours.
  • The application was upheld for lack of individual character, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.10

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308