DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008485809-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-30

000123434

Contested design: 008485809-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008485809-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Litao Xievia PDF extraction

China (CN)

205, Building 7th, Vanke Xinghuo Online, Wuhe Avenue South No.2, Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong China

Represented by

METIDA

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 254, 28F, No. 12, Xihu Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou 510030 China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

pet jacket for dogs

ASIN B08D99JR1Y · Amazon · disclosed 2020-07-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character based mainly on an earlier dog pet jacket disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not challenge the claimed internet disclosure or the applicant's comparison of the designs.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as proof of disclosure under Article 7 and found broad designer freedom for pet clothing.
  • The shared shape, proportions, zip, shoulder belt, and leg openings outweighed minor differences, so the contested design produced the same overall impression and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123141

vs Haoyu Wang

2024-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308