DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015007030-0011

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-11

000124016

Contested design: 015007030-0011

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 015007030-0011. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Flexi-Bogdahn Technik GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Carl-Benz-Weg 13, 22941 Bargteheide, Alemania

Holder · RCD owner

Ediesi SLvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Paseo Ronda, 88 bajo, 03660 Novelda, España

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

animal leash

RCD No 01987181-0001 · Boletín de Dibujos y Modelos Comunitarios · disclosed 2013-06-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, and also alleged bad faith, relying primarily on earlier RCD D1.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and individually distinctive, denied bad faith, and pointed to differences in appearance and product characteristics.
  • The Division treated bad faith and unfair competition as outside this invalidity action and assessed individual character first under Article 6.
  • It found D1 properly disclosed and concluded the shared handle shape, button, outlet, proportions, and overall appearance outweighed minor differences.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full on Article 25(1)(b) with Article 6(1)(b), so the design was invalidated and the holder bore costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123141

vs Haoyu Wang

2024-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308