DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000022694-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-11-06

000010965

Contested design: 000022694-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid in full, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 000022694-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG

Germany (DE)

Am Alten Bahnhof 5, 38122 Braunschweig, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

ASJ Holding ApS

Denmark (DK)

Mølleåparken 50, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark

Represented by

BUDDE SCHOU A/S

Prior art cited (3)

PublicationAnnex 1

pamphlet entitled 'The Innovative Separation of Water from Beet Pulp — Steamdrying' showing a dryer and inlet/outlet valves

EnerDry ApS · disclosed 2003-05-12

OtherAnnex 2

undated photograph of a steam dryer

PublicationAnnex 3

publication entitled 'Steamdrying of beet pulp in Japan and the latest development of the technology' showing the outlet valve

EnerDry ApS

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 4(3)Article 3(c)Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the rotor is a component of a complex steam dryer and is not visible during normal use, so it cannot satisfy Article 4(2) CDR.
  • The holder accepted the rotor is housed in the dryer but argued inspection windows or openings could make it visible during normal use.
  • The Division found the rotor operates inside a sealed casing, the holder proved no real inspection-window practice for this product, and hypothetical visibility is insufficient.
  • The application was upheld and the contested RCD was declared invalid as a whole; the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

31.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127936

vs QuanZhou ZhenSui Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000120870

vs Chuang-Kang Machinery Technology Co., Ltd

2023-04-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000115261

vs GUANGZHOU SUNMILE INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.

2021-08-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000114503

vs F4F Polska Sp. z o.o.

2021-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000113501

vs Guoxin Wei

2021-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000107859

vs CIBERNÉTICA PARA LA PANIFICACIÓN, S.L.

2020-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000107879

vs CORTE, SOLDADURA Y MECANIZADOS, S.L.

2020-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000104759

vs Lifewellness

2019-06-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318