DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004462000-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-06-07

000104759

Contested design: 004462000-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community Design No 0044620000001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s cost fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

PENTA CZ s.r.o.

Czechia (CZ)

Povážská 266, 386 06 Strakonice – Přední Ptákovice, Czechia

Represented by

Jiří Macek

Holder · RCD owner

Lifewellness

Poland (PL)

Al. Jerozolimskie 200, 02 486 Warszawa, Poland

Represented by

Wojciech Gierszewski

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Wide Mouth Slow Juicer / slow juicer

HH918B · SGS Fimko Ltd. test report corroborated by pro-forma and commercial invoices · disclosed 2015-07-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier slow juicer design disclosed before 2017-11-01.
  • To prove disclosure, applicant relied on a 2015 SGS test report plus 2016 pro-forma and 2017 commercial invoices for product HH918B; the holder filed no response.
  • The Division found the documents mutually corroborative and sufficient to prove public disclosure under Article 7, with no rebuttal from the holder.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom and the designs' near-identical shape, chute, lid and base, the contested design created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was invalidated in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

31.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127936

vs QuanZhou ZhenSui Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000120870

vs Chuang-Kang Machinery Technology Co., Ltd

2023-04-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000115261

vs GUANGZHOU SUNMILE INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.

2021-08-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000114503

vs F4F Polska Sp. z o.o.

2021-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000113501

vs Guoxin Wei

2021-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000107859

vs CIBERNÉTICA PARA LA PANIFICACIÓN, S.L.

2020-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000107879

vs CORTE, SOLDADURA Y MECANIZADOS, S.L.

2020-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000010965

vs ASJ Holding ApS

2018-11-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318