DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002910133-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-08-19

000115261

Contested design: 002910133-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002910133-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Robot Coupe Snc.via PDF extraction

France (FR)

48, rue des Vignerons, 94300 Vincennes, France

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Sunmile Industries Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

RM.2701, 2702, 2706, Tower A, Victory Plaza, No.103, Tiyuxi Rd. Guangzhou 510620, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

Electric juicers

Community design registration No 001110209-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-04-17

PatentD2

fruit juice extractor

Chinese design patent application No 201430040023.6 · China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) · disclosed 2014-09-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier designs D1 and D2.
  • The applicant argued the relevant designer freedom was broad and the differences were minor beside strong visual similarities.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found both prior designs were properly disclosed and assessed individual character primarily against D2.
  • It held the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user as D2, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

31.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127936

vs QuanZhou ZhenSui Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000120870

vs Chuang-Kang Machinery Technology Co., Ltd

2023-04-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000114503

vs F4F Polska Sp. z o.o.

2021-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000113501

vs Guoxin Wei

2021-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000107859

vs CIBERNÉTICA PARA LA PANIFICACIÓN, S.L.

2020-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000107879

vs CORTE, SOLDADURA Y MECANIZADOS, S.L.

2020-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000104759

vs Lifewellness

2019-06-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000010965

vs ASJ Holding ApS

2018-11-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318