DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007691456-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-05-06

000114503

Contested design: 007691456-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0076914560001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Twadero B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Minosstraat 5, 5048 CK Tilburg, Netherlands

Holder · RCD owner

F4F Polska Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Gieysztora 6/71, 02999 Warszawa, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

'Optimum 600' electric juicer / 'Optimum Appliances 600 3rd Generation' shown in website screenshots and reviews

www.froothie.nl; www.froothie.de; www.froothie.fr; https://www.productreview.com.au · Froothie websites and productreview.com.au

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures of the 'Optimum 600' juicer.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's disclosure evidence or comparison arguments.
  • The Division accepted the website and review screenshots as prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR before the 12/02/2020 filing date.
  • It found only minor branding and finish differences, held the same overall impression on the informed user, and invalidated the RCD for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

31.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127936

vs QuanZhou ZhenSui Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000120870

vs Chuang-Kang Machinery Technology Co., Ltd

2023-04-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000115261

vs GUANGZHOU SUNMILE INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.

2021-08-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000113501

vs Guoxin Wei

2021-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000107859

vs CIBERNÉTICA PARA LA PANIFICACIÓN, S.L.

2020-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000107879

vs CORTE, SOLDADURA Y MECANIZADOS, S.L.

2020-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000104759

vs Lifewellness

2019-06-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318
000010965

vs ASJ Holding ApS

2018-11-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)318