DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002437178-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-12-18

000011059

Contested design: 002437178-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0024371780003 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Essity Operations Francevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Boulevard Victor Hugo 151-161, 93400 Saint Ouen, Francia

Represented by

Hoyng Rokh Monegier Aarpi

Sophie Micallef

Holder · RCD owner

Sofidel S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via di Lucia 23, 55016 Porcari (LU), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

ornament for toilet paper

RCD No 000280342-0002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2007-06-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and, alternatively, lack of individual character over earlier RCD D1 for paper-product ornamentation.
  • The holder argued the designs differed in the central motif, background texture, and orientation, and that the informed user would notice those differences.
  • The Division found D1 was validly disclosed and that the differences defeated identity, so the novelty ground failed.
  • The Division held those differences were too slight to change the overall impression given the designer's broad freedom, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJose Antonio GARRIDO OTAOLA
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328