DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001453427-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-01-22

000010760

Contested design: 001453427-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No. 001453427-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 001453427-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Högert Technik GmbH

Germany (DE)

Pariser Platz 6a, 10117 Berlin, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Grupa Topex Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Pograniczna 2/4, 02-285 Warszawa, Polen

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa Aleksandra Marcińska

Aleksandra Marcińska

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

tool case with 219 tools (Item# 121219)

shengketools.com · shengketools.com · disclosed 2014-08-14

Catalog

tool case with 219 tools shown on page 20

SANT Manufacturer Ningbo Shengke Tools Co., Ltd. 2014/2015 · SANT Manufacturer Ningbo Shengke Tools Co., Ltd. product catalog · disclosed 2014-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on a Shengke Tools website screenshot dated 14/08/2014 and a 2014/2015 catalog showing an almost identical loaded tool case.
  • Holder argued the evidence was untranslated or insufficiently proven, said any disclosure was outside the relevant EU knowledge threshold, invoked the grace period, and maintained the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the website and catalog evidence, found the catalog published by end-2014 and the web page available since 14/08/2014, and held both disclosures predated the filing date and the grace-period window.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found only minor differences in shape, latches, handle, and tool placement, insufficient to change the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld; the contested RCD was invalidated in full and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.0108.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010761

vs GTX Poland Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.

2019-01-22REUD invalidated03, 089
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidated086
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidated036
000128615

vs Yami Zhongchuang (wenzhou) Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-07REUD invalidated086
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidated036
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidated086
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidated086
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidated086